Morphological typology is a way of classifying the languages of the
world that groups languages according to their common morphological structures.
First developed by brothers Friedrich von Schlegel and August von
Schlegel, the field
organizes languages on the basis of how those languages form words by combining morphemes. Two primary categories exist to distinguish all languages: analytic languages and synthetic
languages, where each term
refers to the opposite end of a continuous scale including all the world's
languages.
Analytic languages
Analytic (or "isolating") languages show a
low ratio of morphemes to words; in fact, the correspondence is nearly one-to-one. Sentences in analytic
languages are composed of independent root morphemes. Grammatical relations
between words are expressed by separate words where they might otherwise be
expressed by affixes, which are present to a minimal degree in such languages.
There is little to no morphological change in words: they tend to be
uninflected. Grammatical categories are indicated by word order (for example,
inversion of verb and subject for interrogative sentences) or by bringing in
additional words (for example, a word for "some" or "many"
instead of a plural inflection like English -s). Individual words
carry a general meaning (root concept); nuances are expressed by other words.
Finally, in analytic languages context and syntax are more important than morphology.
Analytic languages include some of the major East Asian
languages, such as Chinese, and Vietnamese. Note that the ideographic
writing systems of
these languages play a strong role in regimenting linguistic continuity
according to an analytic, or isolating, morphology.
Additionally, English is moderately analytic (probably one of the most analytic of
Indo-European languages, while Afrikaans can be considered as the most analytic of all Indo-European
languages). However, it is traditionally analyzed as a fusional language.
Synthetic languages
Synthetic languages form words by affixing a given
number of dependent morphemes to a root morpheme. The morphemes may be
distinguishable from the root, or they may not. They may be fused with it or
among themselves (in that multiple pieces of grammatical information may
potentially be packed into one morpheme). Word order is less important for
these languages than it is for analytic languages, since individual words
express the grammatical relations that would otherwise be indicated by syntax.
In addition, there tends to be a high degree of concordance (agreement, or cross-reference between different
parts of the sentence). Therefore, morphology in synthetic languages is more
important than syntax. Most Indo-European
languages are
moderately synthetic.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий